« REVIEW: Miss Lovely | Main | PROFILE: Sachin Khedekar »


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


Well, if there was the slightest thought of watching the movie, it is all gone now!


I agree with James Kelly in that this review does,nt fit into its definition and does no justice to the reader .there r other ways of criticism if a movie is not up to the mark ,but this seemed to me , below the standard which we here r accustomed to..being cynical of a work is no wrong but to lose esthetics while doing it sure is,,,

James Kelly

A review should be more a critical analysis of the film rather than a story outline with a few opinions thrown in. Creative style but ultimately not fit for purpose


I found this review innovative as well as tempting enough to watch the movie. Kudos to the writer for this creative style!!!

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)